Should I purchase my lab equipment with OPEX or CAPEX budget?

Share

Deciding whether to purchase lab equipment with an operating expense (OPEX) or capital expense (CAPEX) budget depends on several factors, including your organisation’s financial strategy, budget constraints, and the specific needs of your lab.

Here are the key considerations for each approach:

Capital expenditures (CAPEX)

CAPEX involves buying equipment outright, capitalising and depreciating over its useful life. This approach is suitable for significant, long-term investments, which lab equipment often is.

Advantages
1. Asset ownership: the equipment becomes an asset on your balance sheet, which can enhance the company’s value
2. Tax benefits: depreciation of the equipment can provide tax advantages over several years
3. Long-term use: ideal for equipment that you plan to use for many years without significant technological obsolescence
4. Predictable costs: ongoing costs are generally lower after the initial investment, limited to maintenance and operation
Disadvantages
1. High initial cost: requires significant upfront investment, which might strain the budget or necessitate financing
2. Depreciation: the value of the equipment decreases over time, which might affect financial statements
3. Budget constraints: may be challenging if CAPEX budgets are limited or if approval processes are lengthy and complex

Operating expenses (OPEX)

OPEX involves leasing or renting equipment, where payments are made periodically, and the cost is expensed in the period incurred. This approach is suitable for reducing upfront costs and maintaining flexibility and is especially useful for labs that rely on results-based funding rounds.

Advantages
1. Lower upfront costs: ideal for organsations with limited capital or those that prefer to preserve cash flow
2. Flexibility: easier to upgrade or switch to new technologies as they become available
3. Predictable monthly expenses help budget and manage cash flow with fixed periodic payments
4. Tax deductibility: Lease or rental payments can often be deducted as operating expenses, reducing taxable income in the period they are paid
Disadvantages
1. No ownership: you do not own the equipment, so it does not become an asset on your balance sheet
2. Potentially higher long-term cost: over the long term, leasing or renting might be more expensive than purchasing
3. dependency on vendor: your use of the equipment is tied to the lease agreement, which might include restrictions and obligations

Considerations

1. Financial health and cash flow

If you have strong cash reserves and can afford the upfront costs, CAPEX might be beneficial. If preserving cash flow is a priority, OPEX would be a better choice.

2. Equipment lifespan and technological obsolescence

CAPEX is suitable for equipment with a long useful life and low risk of becoming obsolete. OPEX offers more flexibility for equipment in rapidly changing technological fields.

Because LINQ is modular and flexible, with software and hardware updates included (contract dependent), it should never become unsuitable for your needs or obsolete.

3. Budgetary constraints

If CAPEX budgets are tight or approval for large purchases is difficult to obtain, OPEX can be an alternative.

4. Tax considerations

Evaluate the tax implications of both options, considering depreciation benefits (CAPEX) versus immediate expense deductions (OPEX). Decision factors may include tax benefits like super-deduction, customs duty, and VAT breaks.

5. Long-term strategic goals

Align your decision with the organisation’s long-term strategic goals and financial planning, and explore the opportunity for partnerships that may provide financial benefits for longer-term commitments.  

The choice between CAPEX and OPEX for purchasing lab equipment depends on thoroughly evaluating your organisation’s financial situation, budgetary constraints, equipment needs, and strategic goals. Generally, CAPEX is better for long-term investments with stable technological needs, while OPEX offers flexibility and lower upfront costs, making it ideal for dynamic and rapidly changing environments.

Of course, always discuss your options with your lab automation solutions provider. At Automata, we offer flexible payment terms for our complete lab automation platform, LINQ.

Pay in full, break down deployment costs into smaller chunks across a few years or enquire about our popular pay-per-plate offering, so we get paid when you get paid.

Author
Tips for contract labs: sourcing future-proofed automation solutions 

Tips to help CROs and CDMOs when sourcing future-proofed automation solutions that…

Read more Tips for contract labs: sourcing future-proofed automation solutions 
Two scientists looking at a computer screen and tablet
Five reasons flexibility needs to be a standard feature of automation solutions

Flexibility is crucial for future-proofed automation solutions. Here are five reasons why

Read more Five reasons flexibility needs to be a standard feature of automation solutions
From robot arms to automation platforms: the future of lab tech

Since the last time we talked, Automata and our customers have achieved…

Read more From robot arms to automation platforms: the future of lab tech